Option Pricing with Periodic Volatility : A Modified Black-Scholes Model Using Jacobi Elliptic Functions

Authors

  • Chinwe N. Obi Federal University of Technology , Nigeria Author
  • Bright O. Osu Abia State University , Nigeria Author
  • Promise Azor Federal university Otuoke , Nigeria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64021/

Keywords:

Black-Scholes, Volatility, Jacobi Elliptic Functions, Crank-Nicolson, Option-Pricing

Abstract

In this work, a modified Black-Scholes model for European option pricing is presented, in which the volatility function exhibits a periodic pattern determined by the Jacobi elliptic sine function. This method maintains smoothness and mathematical tractability while capturing organized, oscillatory activity frequently seen in financial markets.

We develop the relevant parabolic partial differential equation and confirm regularity and uniform ellipticity criteria to confirm that it is well-posed. The complete model is solved nu- merically using a Crank-Nicolson finite difference method after a formal solution is derived using the Fourier transform under some assumptions. The findings of the simulation show how volatility patterns and option prices are impacted by changes in the elliptic modulus. Specifi- cally, for short-term and at-the-money options, the model produces rippling price surfaces and observable deviations from traditional Black-Scholes pricing.

This methodology, which remains rooted in the traditional option pricing model while offering insight into periodic risk dynamics, provides a useful and understandable alternative for stochastic volatility models.

References

F. Black and M. Scholes, “The pricing of options and corporate liabilities,” Journal of Political Economy, vol. 81, no. 3, pp. 637–654.

T. G. Andersen, T. Bollerslev, and X. Huang, “Dynamic Return and Volatility Feedback,” J. Econom., vol. 236, no. 1, pp. 234 – 259.

G. J. Jiang and Y. S. Tian, “Implied volatility dynamics and option pricing under time-varying risk,” J. Bank. Financ., vol. 133, p. 106254.

S. L. Heston, “A closed-form solution for options with stochastic volatility with applica- tions to bond and currency options,” Rev. Financ. Stud., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 327–343.

B. Dupire, “Pricing with a smile,” Risk, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–20.

R. Cont and J. Fonseca, “Dynamic Models of Implied Volatility Surfaces,” Applied.

R. Kozhan and R. Thakral, “Periodic Stochastic Volatility and Option Pricing.”

M. Avellaneda and M. D. Lipkin, “Option Pricing with Bounded and Periodic Volatility.”

E. Benhamou, E. Gobet, and M. Miri, “Time-Dependent Volatility and Pricing of.”

J. Liu and F. A. Longstaff, “Option Pricing with Regime-Switching Volatility,” Review of.

P. Christoffersen, S. Heston, and K. Jacobs, “Capturing Option Anomalies with a.”

R. Anand and S. Jain, “Periodic Volatility in Asset Dynamics: Analytical and Numerical.”

A. Youssef and N. El Babsiri, “Elliptic Function-Based Models for Cyclical Risk,” Journal of.

B. O. Osu, A. I. Chukwunezu, C. Olunkwa, and C. N. Obi, “Analyzing the Stock Market Using the Solution of the Fractional Option Pricing Model,” International Journal of Partial Differential Equations and Applications, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–12, doi: 10.12691/ijpdea-6-1-1.

S. Cartea A ́. & Howison, “Option Pricing Models under Fractional and Rough Volatility.”

P. Carr and D. Madan, “Option Valuation using the Fast Fourier Transform,” Journal.

D. J. Duffy, Finite Difference Methods in Financial Engineering. Wiley.

J. Crank and P. Nicolson, “A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type,” Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 50–67.

D. Tavella and C. Randall, “Pricing Financial Instruments: The Finite Difference Method.”

Z. Chen and J. Zhu, “An Improved Finite-Difference Scheme for Nonlinear Option Pricing.”

Downloads

Published

2026-01-03

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Option Pricing with Periodic Volatility : A Modified Black-Scholes Model Using Jacobi Elliptic Functions. (2026). Indonesian Journal of Modern Science and Technology, 2(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.64021/